• Home
  • 12 steps to T-Shirt Logic
  • Imaginometry
  • Evidence Room
  • Level is horizontal Test
  • Illogical arguments
  • T Shirt Logic
  • The E.A.o.A
  • Realising Euclid
  • The Horizontal Paradox
  • Tis globe
  • Advanced Simplicity
  • Rumpus Pole
  • 69ing the globe
  • Terms
  • Destructive Dichotomy
  • More
    • Home
    • 12 steps to T-Shirt Logic
    • Imaginometry
    • Evidence Room
    • Level is horizontal Test
    • Illogical arguments
    • T Shirt Logic
    • The E.A.o.A
    • Realising Euclid
    • The Horizontal Paradox
    • Tis globe
    • Advanced Simplicity
    • Rumpus Pole
    • 69ing the globe
    • Terms
    • Destructive Dichotomy
  • Home
  • 12 steps to T-Shirt Logic
  • Imaginometry
  • Evidence Room
  • Level is horizontal Test
  • Illogical arguments
  • T Shirt Logic
  • The E.A.o.A
  • Realising Euclid
  • The Horizontal Paradox
  • Tis globe
  • Advanced Simplicity
  • Rumpus Pole
  • 69ing the globe
  • Terms
  • Destructive Dichotomy
On The Level

The 'IT IS' statement is something to be sure of. Here we know Tis globe.

The 'IT IS' statement is something to be sure of. Here we know Tis globe.The 'IT IS' statement is something to be sure of. Here we know Tis globe.The 'IT IS' statement is something to be sure of. Here we know Tis globe.The 'IT IS' statement is something to be sure of. Here we know Tis globe.

Harry's Law + Oakley's Gambit

Harry's Law

Harry's law is similar to Godwin's law but makes a distinction to the topic of conversation and length of time within the Arena (abyss) 

Godwin's law states  "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1" 

Harry's law states "As a discussion within the arena (earth shape) progresses, the likelihood of the participants to bring up flatulence, excrement or sexual parts increases with length of time the interlocutors have spent within the arena. 


Oakley's Gambit

Advancing a bold empirical or scientific-sounding claim as if it rests on measurement or expertise, then, when asked for the concrete method, reference points, or any falsifiable procedure, producing no answer and denying the claim was ever substantive (often by invoking “I’m just a YouTuber”).

These claims are known to us as vapor claims or assertion collapse, due to the fact that they evaporate under the slightest pressure. The claim exists only as words until pressure is applied, at which point it dissipates with nothing left to defend.

Nietzsche warned us about the consequences of spending too much time gazing into the arena, never mind participating within it. Some people become accustomed to it, don't become one of them - Be Aware!!! 


Copyright © 2026 Tis Globe - All Rights Reserved.

  • 12 steps to T-Shirt Logic
  • Evidence Room
  • Logic and philopsophy
  • Illogical arguments
  • Oakleys' Gambit

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept